Ageing, mindset, and the body: How belief shapes movement, metabolism, and health
We often think of ageing as something that happens to us… a gradual, inevitable decline in strength, energy, and capacity.
Exercise is framed as something we must deliberately do to slow that decline.
Food becomes something we must carefully control to stay healthy.
But a growing body of research suggests something more nuanced and in my opinion, more hopeful and helpful:
Our bodies respond not only to what we do, but to the meaning we give it.
Ageing, movement, and eating are not just biological processes.
They are deeply shaped by mindset, expectation, and nervous system state.
New blog alert!
〰️
New blog alert! 〰️
Turning back the clock: The ageing mindset study
In the late 1970s, psychologist Ellen Langer conducted a now-classic study on ageing and mindset.
A group of men in their late 70s and early 80s were invited to spend a week at a retreat designed to replicate life 20 years earlier. They weren’t asked to reminisce, they were asked to live as if that earlier time were the present.
They listened to music from that era, discussed world events as if they were current ones, watched television shows as new releases, and spoke about their families and lives in the present tense of that decade.
They were invited to embody a younger version of themselves.
What changed?
By the end of the week, the men showed measurable improvements in:
Physical strength and flexibility
Posture and gait
Vision and hearing
Cognitive functioning and memory
Independent observers rated them as looking younger than when they arrived.
And the amazing part, nothing about their biology had fundamentally changed. What changed was their expectation of their bodies. And their nervous systems responded accordingly.
When exercise “counts”: Movement and meaning
Another well-known study explored mindset from a different angle, this time with women working as hotel housekeepers.
Despite spending hours each day lifting, walking, vacuuming, and scrubbing, many of these women reported that they did not exercise. In their minds, exercise meant gyms, workouts, and sport, not the movement embedded in daily life.
Researchers educated one group of women that their work already met recommended physical activity guidelines. The other group received no such information.
Without changing their behaviour at all, the women who reframed their work as exercise showed:
Reduced weight
Lower body fat
Decreased blood pressure
Improved BMI
The movement didn’t change.
The meaning of the movement did.
When food becomes a threat
Mindset doesn’t stop at ageing or exercise.
It also powerfully shapes how we digest and metabolise food.
Many people eat with an internal commentary like:
“I shouldn’t be eating this.”
“This is bad for me.”
“I’ll have to compensate later.”
From a nervous system perspective, this is not neutral thinking.
It’s threat-based language.
When food is framed as dangerous, forbidden, or morally wrong, the body often shifts into a stress response, activating sympathetic nervous system pathways and stress hormones such as cortisol.
And here’s the paradox supported by research:
Eating in a threat state can lead the body to extract and store more energy from the same meal.
The research: The body responds to meaning
In studies examining food mindset, participants consumed identical meals but were given different narratives about what they were eating.
Some were led to believe the meal was:
Indulgent
High-calorie
“Bad” or excessive
Others were told it was:
Nourishing
Balanced
Supportive of their health
Despite the meals being nutritionally identical, the physiological responses differed.
Those who believed they were eating something indulgent showed:
Altered ghrelin responses (the hormone linked to hunger and fullness)
Less satiety
A stress-oriented metabolic profile
Those who believed they were eating something nourishing showed hormonal patterns associated with greater regulation and satisfaction.
The body didn’t just digest the food.
It digested the story about the food.
Why threat changes metabolism
From an evolutionary perspective, this makes sense.
When the nervous system perceives threat:
Energy conservation increases
Storage is prioritised
The body prepares for uncertainty
If eating is paired with guilt, fear, or self-criticism, the system may interpret the moment as:
“Resources are unsafe, hold on to everything!”
This doesn’t mean mindset overrides biology entirely. But it does shape how biology is expressed.
The cost of control-based health
For many people, particularly those with a history of dieting, trauma, or disordered eating… ageing, movement, and food are all approached through control.
Control often looks responsible on the surface.
But internally, it keeps the nervous system in a chronic low-grade threat state.
Over time, this can contribute to:
Dysregulated hunger and fullness cues
Cycles of restriction and overeating
Fatigue and inflammation
Disconnection from body trust
Not because the body is broken, but because it is constantly trying to protect.
A nervous-system reframe
Across all of these studies, a common thread emerges:
Safety changes physiology.
When we:
Relate to ageing with curiosity rather than fear
Relate to movement as capacity rather than punishment
Relate to food as nourishment rather than threat
the nervous system shifts toward regulation.
That shift supports:
Digestion
Metabolism
Energy availability
Physical resilience over time
This isn’t about ignoring health or evidence.
It’s about recognising that relationship matters as much as behaviour.
Final reflection
Ageing is not just a biological process.
Exercise is not just a physical task.
Eating is not just a mathematical equation.
They are lived experiences shaped by meaning, belief, and nervous system state.
When we change the story, even gently, the body often follows.
Not because it’s easily fooled.
But because it is exquisitely responsive to how safe, capable, and supported it feels.
If this resonated with you
If you noticed yourself slowing down as you read this…
If parts of it felt familiar, uncomfortable, or quietly relieving…
That’s worth paying attention to.
Often, resonance isn’t about agreement, it’s about recognition.
You might be someone who has:
Been hard on your body in the name of “health”
Felt anxious about ageing or physical decline
Struggled with food feeling categorised or loaded
Used control to try to feel safe
None of that means you’ve failed.
It usually means your nervous system has been doing its best to protect you.
This work isn’t about trying harder or thinking more positively.
It’s about gently shifting the relationship you have with your body, toward safety, trust, and capacity.
And that kind of shift often happens best in relationship, not alone.
If this piece spoke to you, you’re welcome to:
Sit with what came up
Notice where your body responded
Get curious rather than critical
And if you’d like support exploring this more deeply around ageing, food, movement, trauma, or nervous system regulation, working with a clinician trained in these approaches can help create change that feels sustainable, not forced.
Your body isn’t the problem.
The story it’s been carrying might just be ready to soften.
Check out my latest blogs…
